Comments on: Can an atheist understand this logic.Or tell me if I am wrong.

By: mememememe

mememememe — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

SUMMARIZE IT INTO ONE WORD

By: neil s

neil s — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

See “argument from incredulity”. There is no logic here.

By: Nowpower

Nowpower — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

Read the material.

We’ll wait.

By: magpieix A.L.M.N.

magpieix A.L.M.N. — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

You’re wrong.

Anything else I can do for you.

By: Amber

Amber — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

“but the more meaningful reason is I want a cup of tea”

You can want a cup of tea all you want, it’s not going to happen until you boil the water and put in the tea bag.

Not to mention that nearly everything else you said is incorrect as well.

By: It’s so clear now!

It’s so clear now! — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

The idea of strict objectivity in intellectual circles is a myth. While most scholars like to think of themselves as broad-minded, unprejudiced paragons of virtue, the fact is that they, too, on occasion, suffer from bouts of bias, bigotry, and presuppositionalism.

Narcissism & egos overrun the scientific world.

By: deacon666smirk

deacon666smirk — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

You are wrong, and for this reason: There is ABSOLUTELY NO credible, verifiable, tangible, concrete or irrefutable evidence that supports the existence of any ‘god’. If you think differently, present that evidence to this forum. We’re waiting.

By: Bella C <3 v3.0

Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

ugh, for the last time I’m an atheist, NOT a molecular biologist. So naturally, I cannot answer your biology questions. But there are people who can.

By: Andrew

Andrew — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

Fruit flies can’t turn into already existing species.

By: HeRmiT

HeRmiT — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

Read

Evolution for Wingnuts